EOM+Questions+and+Answers

EOM Responses EOM Table 1 What does the data tell you? **It tells the number of teachers whose evaluations were submitted online. It shows the correlation between teachers knowing the content and student growth. Overall, we did a good job of rating teachers on their knowledge of content.**
 * 1) What does the data NOT tell you? **We don't know how long teachers have been teaching, years of experience of evaluators. We also do not know the experience of the administrators who were evaluating.**
 * 2) What overall conclusions can you make about the data? **There are pockets of accuracy throughout. However, we have some tendancy to overrate.**
 * 3) What surprised you or your team about the data? **There is some surprise at the lower percentage of teachers who know their content. Scary!**
 * 4) If you were the new Superintendent of Craven County Schools, how would you respond to this data? **I would provide additional training to administrators with "hands-on" opportunities for evaluation opportunities and follow-up conversations with other administrators.**

EOM Table 3 What does the data tell you? Relationship between school performance and teacher evaluation ratings

What does the data NOT tell you? Who did the evaluation, does not tell you entire staff evaluated

What overall conclusions can you make about the data? More conversation between staff and administration

What surprised you or your team about the data? Some of the high ratings of schools, the number of beginning T's and career

If you were the new Superintendent of Craven County Schools, how would you respond to this data? Need for opportunities to network and pair up to observe teacher together, have some courageous conversation about teacher evaluation

EOM Table 5


 * 1) What does the data tell you?
 * Lots of opportunity
 * Red means you are an aggressive evaluator
 * Shows trend
 * 1) What does the data NOT tell you?
 * Personnel changes
 * Demographics of staff
 * Experience level ~ teacher turnover rates
 * Budgetary ramifications
 * At high school level ~ Doesn't tell you which teacher teaches which course
 * At elementary level ~ doesn't break it down by grade level (k-2 vs. 3-5)
 * Some schools did not put evaluations in because it wasn't required
 * What did principals put in place to help make it successful
 * Staffing issues
 * 1) What overall conclusions can you make about the data?
 * Possible need for more training for administrators
 * Administrators have to be well versed in understanding curriculum expectations ~ be able to provide support to all levels of staff and levels of integration
 * 1) What surprised you or your team about the data?
 * 2) If you were the new Superintendent of Craven County Schools, how would you respond to this data?
 * 1) If you were the new Superintendent of Craven County Schools, how would you respond to this data?

EOM Table 6


 * 1) What does the data tell you?
 * 2) What does the data NOT tell you?
 * 3) What overall conclusions can you make about the data?
 * 4) What surprised you or your team about the data?
 * 5) If you were the new Superintendent of Craven County Schools, how would you respond to this dat

1. All schools are all over....range to low to high...high to low 2. 3. Not every school is on the same page 4 .Expectations vary by principals....expectations are different 5. Create a system of tangible experiences that should be a reference point for administrators.

EOM table 7 What does the data tell you? there's some inconsistencies with those distinguished and high composite score (Growth is low and teacher scoring high) Administrators may be inconsistent on how they facilitate professional development and evaluations

What does the data NOT tell you? Number of teachers that are renewing licenses Whose included and not included Which schools allow teachers to facilitate instructional growth, i.e. PLC, Early Release Days, Faculty Meetings

What overall conclusions can you make about the data? Good information but not to take it as the Gospel A lot of irregularities Good Snapshot

What surprised you or your team about the data? We expected to see good teachers equal better results and vice versa

If you were the new Superintendent of Craven County Schools, how would you respond to this data? Careful not to assume based on limited time or availability of data

EOM Table 8


 * 1) What does the data tell you? Not every teacher effects results. (SS/Science different from Math/ELA)
 * 2) What does the data NOT tell you? What data is used to make this determination. What teachers teach? Who was evaluated? You have no data for teachers who did not have full evaluations. This does not include the full year. New teachers may already be proficient
 * 3) What overall conclusions can you make about the data? I think the data is backwards, based on the PDPs. Data not clear yet
 * 4) What surprised you or your team about the data? No teahcers had PDP developed by the system. Low number of proficient for teachers compared to proficieny of students.
 * 5) If you were the new Superintendent of Craven County Schools, how would you respond to this data? Data needs to be looked at by individual sites.